Profile: Harvey Baskin, the Last
Farmer
By Charles Wohlforth
All Rights Reserved
First published 10/13/91 in the Anchorage Daily News We
Alaskans section
For the second week without a break it is raining, cold and
gray but
for the changing leaves, and around the farmhouse the ground is mud,
the roads pitted, and the hay, already cut while the sun shone, soggy
and rotting in the fields. Inside, Harvey Baskin sits at his kitchen
table making another list, like the thousands of others he has made in
nine years of trying to build a dairy farm in the wilderness of Point
MacKenzie.
In those nine years he has made a list every day of the
countless
steps to his task -- steps forward to try to match all the steps back.
He doesn't put down the routine work, like hauling grain and feeding
cattle, milking 80 cows at 5 a.m., feeding ducks, geese, chickens,
dogs. The lists are about fixing fences, bulldozers, trucks and plows;
insulating buildings, digging pits; putting back up all the things that
nature and defeatist gravity pull down. Making a list is like a prayer.
If Baskin can cross off these jobs, he'll still be here. He won't have
given up, like all the others.
But the list Baskin is making today isn't about the jobs he,
his
grandson and hired hands have to do. He has been asked how he did it.
How it is that, out of a dozen farmers who in 1982 won the chance to
build a dairy farm on Point MacKenzie, he is the only one left who
still owns his farm and produces milk; the only one who gives a last
gasp of life to the state government's dead and forgotten dream that it
could create out of nothing a thriving agricultural economy of happy
family farmers. Instead, the project produced bankruptcies, scores of
lawsuits, and bitter, ruined people whose years of work have been wiped
out, their fields returning to forest. And it produced Baskin, who
isn't so easy to define. He isn't a quitter or a loser, he still owns
his farm; but he isn't a winner, either.
So he is asked how he did it. How did he survive? Why is he
still
here? And he sits down alone to make a list of advice for future Point
MacKenzie farmers:
1. Live on farm 24 hours a day.
2. Personally do all of your own work.
3. Don't plan on making money.
4. Be out for hard work and disappointments.
5. Use your best, conservative decisions.
6. Don't go "first class.'
7. Don't trust or depend on government "experts."
8. Sacrifice money, time, comfort, health, friends, family and
leisure time.
9.
He writes nothing under No. 9. Instead, he throws down the
list, and
later explains, "My only piece of advice would be, "Don't get into it
in the first place.' "
Life's problems channel strange paths. Harvey Baskin traces
one from
Vietnam's 1968 Tet Offensive to these damp fields. He left behind his
home in Louisiana to join the Marines for the close of World War II,
when he was 17, then joined the Air Force for the Korean War when the
Marines wanted him back. He stayed in, brought the family to Alaska in
1963, left again in '67 for California, and the next year went to
Vietnam for nine months, while the family lived in Arizona. Then back
to California, back to Vietnam, back to Louisiana, and so on.
Harvey retired the last day of 1976, in Anchorage, a Chief
Master Sergeant, and his life came to a stop.
"It was what the old timers used to call a nervous breakdown,
as a
result of what had happened," he said. "The first time it happened to
me was in Vietnam. . . . I'd forget where I was, who I was, all kind of
crazy things."
Part of it was that Baskin just didn't know how not to work,
said
his wife, Merlene Baskin. Because Harvey Baskin is all about work.
"Harvey was retired and really didn't know what to do with
himself
except sit here losing it," she said. "He sat here about four years,
just pretty much doing nothing. . . . He became almost like a
vegetable. He sat here in the living room, and he wasn't interested in
TV, or fishing or hunting or anything."
It was Harvey's idea to try to get one of the farms. In 1982
the
state was raffling off agriculture rights on big parcels of prime land
at Point MacKenzie just a few miles across Knik Arm, but about 65 road
miles from Anchorage. The 14,000 acres of land was divided into 32
parcels, roughly split between proposed dairy farms and hay farms.
Baskin read about the project in the newspaper. He could see
himself
with his horses and his dogs on one of the non-dairy tracts, just a big
piece of land he could clear, build a cabin on, and watch the hay grow
in the field. He and Merlene both thought that was the kind of active
retirement that would make him snap out of his lethargy. Although he
had lived on a farm as a child, he never had been a farmer -- but that
didn't matter to the state, which legally was not allowed to consider
the qualifications of the people to whom it gave the parcels.
The Alaska dairy industry was already dying, and Gov. Jay
Hammond
thought he could save it. Dairy farming had been developed by
Depression era homesteaders in the Matanuska Valley. As the Valley grew
closer to Anchorage, the value of their land rose; as Anchorage grew
closer to Seattle, the value of Matanuska milk fell. It was never an
easy life, and most chose to sell out to developers, who during the
1970s were turning the Valley into a bedroom for Anchorage commuters.
The state's interlocking dairy plan was supposed to create brand new
farms that would quickly take over the milk market, providing cows to
eat the grain produced on the state's barley project at Delta, and
helping Alaska toward food self-sufficiency that would carry on past
the oil years.
The name of Baskin's youngest daughter, Abby Baskin, was the
first
to be called at the drawing at Palmer High School. And with it, Baskin
had his hay farm. Then, a little later, Merlene's name came up for a
dairy parcel. No matter -- they would just return hers and let the
state draw it again. "I laughed at the time, because I knew better than
to get into dairy," Harvey said.
At the drawing, Merlene got up from her chair and walked to
the front of the room to turn in her unwanted cow farm.
"There was some man standing there, to this day I don't know
who it
was," Merlene said. "He said, "What did you get?' I said, "A dairy
parcel.' He said, "Take it. That's where the money is.' To this day, I
still don't know what that means."
But the couple was persuaded. They accepted the state's 865
acres of
land on the two farms; raw, wild land, habitat for moose, bears and
wolves, where tall spruce and birch trees spread around ponds and over
gentle hills and across broad, flat stretches of quiet forest. There
was no human mark other than holes and blasting caps left by early
seismic explorers for oil. And, thanks to the state's unrestrained
affluence, wide, well-maintained gravel roads that would be the envy of
any rural Alaska town had just been built right up to the prospective
front door, and electrical lines now crisscrossed the area to bring
power to any spot where a farmer might imagine he would need it.
Baskin could drive right up and look at his land.
"Back in that home state of mine, anything you'd tried to do,
there
had been 50 people who had tried the exact same thing on the same piece
of ground. And when I got up here, here was this place where no one had
ever cut a tree. And I wondered if I should be the one to do it. I even
pushed up bears out of their dens when I was clearing this land.
"We didn't want to destroy this land."
Harvey and Merlene had met when she was 13 and he was three
years
older, on the bayou in Louisiana. Their families had long known each
other, but they met waiting for the school bus as teen-agers. The war
was on and Harvey was just short of the age to go. Each morning he
paddled across from home in a rowboat to where he would wait for the
bus with Merlene. They married when she turned 17, in 1948.
It has been an unusual marriage. Merlene took care of the
family
alone for long stretches during Harvey's military career. In Anchorage,
she owned a successful Elmendorf Air Force Base gift shop for 13 years.
The couple often lives apart for a week or more at a time, but also
works long hours together. It seems to have worked: They are still
together, and are no longer poor. They alone have survived Point
MacKenzie.
"Starting out ourselves like we did, very poor people, and
then
being able to make it on our own, I think that helped us to deal with
it better than other people," Merlene said, from her home in Anchorage.
"Because us, we don't do anything but work. We either work together or
separately. I'm sitting here working right now. It's all we know."
That may be why the family decided to go ahead and start
bulldozing
the trees on Point MacKenzie. It was work, seemingly the only thing
that could keep them happy. Merlene said she always knew it would be
difficult. She didn't have romantic illusions about farming. She knew
it wouldn't be fun.
"I wasn't into farming," she said. "I grew up with farming,
and I
knew it all my life. I knew what it was all about. But I wanted to have
some roots to leave to our family. Something we could leave to them.
Because we don't really have any roots. And this is something they
could keep and live on to take care of them even if the world situation
got real bad."
They are closer to that goal than anyone else, but still
perilously
far. Their son, Lance Baskin, helped Harvey clear and work the land and
built a cabin there where he is raising his two children. One was born
on the farm. But Lance still refuses to build a permanent house there.
He cut and peeled huge spruce logs for it years ago, but while he
waited to see what would happen, waited to see how the state would set
about saving the project, the logs rotted. His cabin is built on skids,
ready to move. After nine years on the state's project, even the
survivors don't know if it will work.
"The reason I'm still out here today is that no one else would
do
it," Harvey said. "That is, get out here and do this hard work,
grubbing work, knowing deep down that you never would make any money at
it. . . . When we say succeed, we only mean that I'm here today. Next
week it may be a different story."
Step one in building a farm: Buy a bulldozer. Baskin found
one, a
1960s- vintage Allis Chalmers for sale in Anchorage for $24,000. But
the state, which was willing to lend each farmer $1 million to build a
farm, wouldn't lend Baskin the money for the bulldozer; agriculture
officials said he couldn't survey and clear hundreds of acres by
himself, not knowing what he was doing. They would only lend him money
to hire a contractor to do it. But a surveyor would charge $13,000 to
stake the perimeter, and a contractor would charge $96,000 to clear the
land.
Harvey bought the bulldozer.
"All this was trees back then," he said, leaning against a
fence in
the rain, "and the guy pulled up with it on a trailer and said, "Mr.
Baskin, why don't you drive it off?' And I said, "What?' He said, "You
don't know how to drive it?' And I said, "I've never even been this
close to one before.' So he drove it off, and I waited until he was out
of sight. And then I started it up. And I didn't know where the thing
shut off, running around there knocking down trees before I figured it
out."
He bought a transit a surveyor's telescope-like instrument to
do the
surveying himself, and a book to tell him how. To blaze the farm's
perimeter he put his son, Lance, at one corner of the land with the
transit and a CB radio. Lance aimed the transit at a red spot painted
on the dozer blade, which was along an imaginary line leading to the
next corner. Harvey began driving. If the dozer began to stray from the
line, the red spot would wander in the transit sight. Then Lance would
tell Harvey over the CB, "A little to the left," or "A little to the
right." It worked, and the perimeter was soon marked by wide, straight
dozer lines through the forest.
Most of the time Baskin worked by himself, and the past still
trapped him. The land was not a miracle cure.
"When I first got out here, I could hardly work on something.
I'd
just lay down and cry," Baskin said. He couldn't make decisions,
couldn't attack the work he had to do. He was alone. One day he lay
down on the ground as afternoon turned to evening and then night,
paralyzed by the fear of a broken machine.
But slowly, the work was working on him; and the more work he
did, the stronger he got. And then work became its own compulsion.
"There was no hours, no months, no weather," he said. "It was
just
the same all the time. I'd work 26 hours straight and then zonk out."
Harvey lived in an old travel trailer parked on the land and
called
Merlene in Anchorage every day by CB radio. When the dozer broke down,
he tried to repair it himself out in the open air. His first structure
was a makeshift shelter so he could work on the vehicles and machinery
out of the rain and snow. Baskin didn't call mechanics to work on the
machines after the first couple of times.
"The first thing they would do was ask, "Where's your service
manual?' Well I figured I could read the manual as well as they could,
and a lot cheaper," Baskin said. "It's senseless to pay a note to hire
somebody to work for you when you can do the work yourself."
That was his credo. But other farmers were spending their
borrowed
money to hire people. Some hired Baskin to clear their land with his
dozer. He never got off it, winter or summer. He worked as if the years
of lethargy were an open mouth following behind him.
He drove the dozer all day, in cold winter weather, clearing
acre
after acre of trees without taking a break. At the end of one day, he
got off and fell flat on the ground. After sitting still so long, his
legs had stopped working. When he could stand, he dragged himself
inside to build a fire in the pot-bellied stove, his hands blundering
with the numbing cold.
He figures he did work worth $180,000 with his $24,000 dozer.
Other farmers paid him $22,000 for clearing their land.
Most of the farmers pushed the trees up in huge berm piles,
then lit
fires that darkened the sky over Anchorage, causing outrage over the
waste and pollution. Baskin made a deal with a Valley woodcutter to set
up a small sawmill on his growing spread. In exchange for the timber,
the woodcutter gave Baskin a share of the finished lumber. Baskin then
turned the lumber into the buildings he needed, and hauled round logs
to Anchorage in his truck to sell by the cord as firewood.
He knew nothing about how to build the sheds, barns and living
quarters he needed, but he figured it out. The shop is a tall building
held up by vertical logs that are crossed at the top by huge beams. Up
a flight of stairs, beside the storage loft, are the modest living
quarters he built for himself. The barn was his bathroom.
Some built their farmhouses first -- structures like suburban
tract
houses in Anchorage, although Harvey calls them "Those nice mansion
houses down the road." Baskin built his cow barn first. He hired an
expert to design it, then had a contractor build it out of steel and
concrete. "That's your revenue. You take care of that first, then you
take care of yourself," he said. The milking machinery is simple,
though. Baskin didn't want to buy anything that he couldn't fix at 11
o'clock on a Friday night, without a specialist.
There was a proud, optimistic community on the Point then. It
was
1985. Some farmers hadn't been able to meet the state's three-year
development deadline and were already in court, their half-finished
barns left to decay, rusty hammers left beside half-driven nails.
Others had ignored the rules and consolidated their farms to create a
larger, more economic unit. They tried to fool the state's inspectors
into thinking they had small, individual farms by building little
matchbox barns where they would unload cows, swapping them from farm to
farm, just in time for regular inspections. But, altogether, the
farmers had accomplished a seemingly impossible task. They had built
seven dairy farms, and soon they were breaking production records with
the top- quality cows they had brought home from all over North
America. They built a school for their children.
But it was all an illusion built on an error, and it didn't
last
long. When the farmers started, their market for milk was the Matanuska
Maid creamery, a farmer-owned co-op that had always paid top dollar for
milk -- as much as twice the price set by federal price supports in
Washington state. Consequently Mat Maid had to charge its customers
more in the store, and even then it didn't make enough to put money
back into its plant. In 1984 Mat Maid went bankrupt, leaving the state
holding more than $3 million in debt. The state took over the
dilapidated plant, then in need of about $3 million in improvements.
But the state wasn't in as expansive a mood as it had been
three
years earlier, when it poured so much money into the dairy project.
Bill Sheffield was governor, not Jay Hammond, and the oil money that
had paid for it all was slipping away. Soon after the first Point
MacKenzie farmers started producing, the state slashed the price Mat
Maid paid for milk.
Even at the lower price, the creamery still couldn't make
money or
put milk in the stores at a competitive price. It was quickly
overwhelmed by the huge production boom from the Point, and had to pour
much of the new milk down the sewer. That brought a fresh public outcry
about the waste, and Mat Maid began selling the milk in Seattle, even
though that cost more than buying the milk and just throwing it away.
The drastically reduced milk price paid to Alaska farmers --
still
far above the Seattle price -- was a heavy blow for the Point MacKenzie
farmers. The brief period of optimism was soon gone, never to return.
Economic plans that had justified the farms were now worthless. They
were all based on the higher milk price. And they had been speculative
at that.
The project's blueprint came from a 1980 report authored by
University of Alaska Fairbanks professor Carol Lewis. It was as
optimistic as all the plans the university's agriculture experts had
pushed over the years in their campaign for a massive state investment
in agriculture. In 1976 UAF Professor James Drew had predicted that
Alaska could become the nation's northern breadbasket, with agriculture
rivaling oil and gas in economic importance -- a notion embraced by the
Hammond administration.
But, like the study that justified the Delta barley debacle,
Lewis'
Point MacKenzie plan was based on unrealistically high prices and large
markets. It anticipated that the farms could be developed in only three
years. And it called for uneconomically small family farms. The
timetable was a mistake, Lewis would say later; the farm size a
political necessity.
The project was dying as soon as it was born. Farmers had
spent too
much of the borrowed state money trying to build their farms in three
years. The haste meant more work had to be hired out and couldn't be
done as carefully. Baskin ended up burning much of his wood because
there wasn't time to harvest it, and he spent more on his barn than he
planned. His $550,000 development plan ended up costing $700,000. Other
farms had worse problems and spent much more. Their loan payments were
too large, their income too small. The larger farms -- some of them
owned by doctors or lawyers -- also had hired managers and big staffs;
the owners rarely set foot on the grounds. Without supervision, money
went out too fast.
Soon everyone was in debt to the state for the $1 million
maximum.
With more state loans difficult to obtain, some could not afford to
operate. Baskin's loan payments were $4,500 a month. Some farmers never
made a payment; Baskin says he paid his own bill month in and month
out, except when the state declared a moratorium.
Other farmers realized early on that the numbers didn't add
up, and
waited for the state to come up with a debt restructuring plan that
would make more sense. But even without making payments some were in
trouble. There were rumors of cows going hungry. One farmer went
bankrupt. Another couldn't afford to keep up his insurance, then lost
everything when his barn burned down.
In 1987, Baskin was in trouble, too. People thought he would
be the
next to go under. In the cold of winter, he ran out of money and had to
turn to his family and friends. Like all the others, he was bitter
about the state.
"Be very watchful about expert advice," he says now, as if
giving
advice for some future Point MacKenzie fiasco. "These people are
agriculture scientists. If they run short of money all they have to do
is tell the secretary, "Increase the budget in that area right there.'
How am I supposed to increase my budget? I'm out here with my butt on
the line. I've been out here in a crisis in mid-winter, flat out of
money. And in the dairy business, you're dealing with animals you can't
just go a day without feeding them or miss milking a day. You go three
days and you're out of business."
In 1989, when Tom Rogers quit farming, a lot of people who
knew
Point MacKenzie gave up hope for it. Rogers was a lifelong dairy farmer
from Michigan who built the model Point MacKenzie farm. People said
that if anyone could make it, he could. But even after the state
offered to stretch his debt to 30 years at 1 percent interest, Rogers
found the figures still didn't add up right. He'd be working for
nothing. So he got the best deal he could from the state he walked away
free and clear, and could sell his cattle and equipment to extract
enough money for a decent retirement.
Dr. J. Michael James was going out of the dairy business at
the same
time, but state officials decided his farm was too large to let go.
They gave him a deal under which he gave up the deed but was allowed to
remain on the property paying a nominal rent. His $1.4 million debt was
erased and he got to borrow another $700,000. When Rogers went out of
business, James got to rent his farm, too. But he paid $500 a month for
it, instead of the $4,400 a month Rogers had paid in monthly debt
service. Then, this summer, James gave up, too, walking away from his
second debt. The state rented the farms out to another family, starting
fresh.
Seven farmers once produced on Point MacKenzie. After James
gave up,
Baskin was the only one left who still milked cows on his own farm.
Tucker Dairy, the big farm made up of the cow-swapping farmers, quit
because it couldn't make money. Another dairy ran short of money, then
had its barn collapse under snow. A third gave its deed back to the
state, although it continues to produce a little milk.
That leaves Baskin.
His cows now produce 90,000 pounds of milk a month, about 9
percent
of the state's total milk production. (The rest comes from two longtime
dairymen in Palmer; the University of Alaska's experimental farm; a
group of small operators near Delta, and two Point MacKenzie farmers
who rent their land from the state.)
Like Rogers, Baskin doesn't think he can ever make any money
at it.
But he won't give up. He has a swagger when he talks about it. There's
that Southern accent, billowing with self-praise. Then he seems to
catch himself in mid- swagger. Yes, he made it when no one else did.
But he got nothing for it. The same forces in his personality that
brought him this far will keep him going, even though he knows he still
will get nothing out of it in the end. At that thought he seems halfway
between pride, shame and despair. The farm is a victory and a loss;
it's his family's roots and its shackles.
"You've got to be cut out for this, and that's something you
don't
know until you try, like an old bird dog the first time you take him
hunting," Baskin says. "Think about your home and your family, if you
knew you could never pay for that home the way the bank had fixed it
up. Think about the damn fool like me, actually out here suffering and
doing this stuff, and wondering, "What am I ever going to get out of
it.' The one thing I ever got out of it was that it made me twice as
strong physically, mentally, emotionally everything but financially."
Now another administration is taking its turn. Gov. Wally
Hickel
appointed a task force in July to offer delinquent farmers a deal: Give
up the farm and they don't have to pay the debt. Assistant Attorney
General Kevin Saxby said the task force's work is done, but no
settlements have come out of it yet. Baskin is still in negotiations.
Baskin is hesitant to say anything that might anger state
officials.
But most of the former farmers on Point MacKenzie seem to feel bitter,
betrayed and bewildered about how they were treated by their state
government.
"The state wasn't farsighted enough to get the project on
solid
ground when it started," Tom Rogers said. "What they told us when we
got into it, and what they did once it got started were two completely
different things. I don't think the state wants it to work.
"There was a lot of esprit de corps when we started that
project.
There were a lot of high hopes. But then it went down in the second and
third year. I began to get discouraged because of what the state was
doing. What they were offering us 15 years down the road just wasn't
workable. We'd end up with nothing."
Rogers was uncomfortable answering the question of why Baskin
made
it and he didn't. How did a man who knew almost nothing about dairy
farming end up with a farm, while Rogers, with it in his blood, ended
up living in a suburb of Wasilla?
"It isn't how good an operator you are," he said. "The
scenario the
state set up is what started all the problems. Harvey had a capability
of learning, and he did a good job with what he had. He worked his butt
off."
The road to Baskin's has changed in the six years since he
built his
farm. It is used now only by Baskin and the two other farmers who rent
their land, plus hunters and fishermen who park along the network in
the summer and fall. Matanuska Maid doesn't have to carry as much milk
out of here anymore, and now about 60 percent of its product comes from
Washington.
The view along the road has changed, too. Some of the wrecked
farms
have been there for five years, but now there are new forests starting.
They are well into the first stage of growth, willows standing up like
switches, offering food for moose.
Today, in the rain, there are signs of movement only at the
Baskin
spread, behind the freshly whitewashed rail fence, where young men
unload grain for a herd of cows, sheep look up from their meal of
grass, geese wander questioningly in the mud, and scruffy dogs keep
track of all.
Harvey Baskin is obviously proud to show off what he has
built. He
says he makes money on the side selling organically raised sheep to
Anchorage Muslims. He built the barn with the floor sloping inward to
prevent glaciation. The worst thing that can happen, he explains, is
for anything to freeze solid. The cows produce 3,500 BTUs of heat
apiece, he says, enough to keep the barn warm with all the insulation
he socked in the walls. He gives them 60-degree water to drink to help
them stay warm, heating it up as it comes from the well with warmth
captured from the cooling milk. A chain of mechanical shovels pulls the
cows' manure away, a slight electric shock on their backs reminding
them where to stand when they defecate.
"As far as producing milk up here in Alaska and making it a
business, hell yes," he says. "In the first years here we broke all
kinds of records for production." But when he is pressed about the
advantages Washington farmers have -- the lower price of Washington
grain, a transportation and distribution system, a network of other
farmers to shoulder the costs -- Baskin finally says, "What's so damn
new about a subsidy?"
It seems to be easier for Merlene to accept the way the farm
has worked out.
"Sometimes we make a little money, sometimes we break even,
and
sometimes we go behind," she says. "It wasn't something to get in to
make money off of. All we wanted was . . . to develop the land and the
home for our kids and grandkids. It was the last opportunity in the
world to do it. If they had given us long enough we wouldn't have
needed any money from the state."
It is a Sunday afternoon.
Merlene is working in Anchorage. Harvey is working out on the
farm.
"Harvey called me a while ago, and two grandkids was picking
his
peas," Merlene says by telephone. "One was working in the barn, and one
was riding my four-wheeler, even though he's not supposed to, rounding
up the cows. It's a family thing."
Out on Point MacKenzie, Harvey is walking down the front
stairs of
the farm house when he stops, suddenly, to look out a little window and
list the things about his life that make him happy. The grandchildren
running around on the farm -- that's high on the list.
He doesn't hunt anymore, and that used to be one of his joys.
At
least he doesn't hunt the way he thinks of hunting. Now, when he is
working in the fields, if he sees a moose, he remembers where he saw
it, then comes back at the end of the day, shoots it and loads it on
the tractor to haul back to the house.
Good times? He recalls seeing a dairy cow come out of the
woods
once, pushing along a newly born calf. He recalls riding horseback
rounding up the cows between the trees, and hearing wolves circling and
trying to track them down. He also remembers freezing on the back of
his bulldozer.
"I've walked out of every corner of these woods, bogged down,
broken
down or froze up," he says. "I try to soothe my feelings by saying, if
you lose everything tomorrow, you've made it farther than anyone else.
But that's not very soothing when you think that you would lose
everything you ever had."
Standing on the stairs, he looks out a little window at the
gray sky and ground, and the strip of yellow trees beyond.
"The unpleasant times out here outweigh the pleasant ones by
about
1,000- to-1," he says. "The only time I'm really at ease is when I'm
out in one of the backfields working, and I can clean my mind of all
the thoughts of the debt, the weather, the hired hands. . . ."
Another list, this time of his worries, seems to take over
Baskin's
concentration, and his voice trails off. Then, a moment later, he is
ready to get back to work, moving in his quick, slightly hyperactive
way. He needs to talk to some men about slaughtering some unproductive
cows. His mind is occupied again.